SerenityVault Protocol™ — architecture project•ML-KEM-1024 + ML-DSA-87 (NIST FIPS 203/204)•TRINITY: defense, governance, coordination•AURA and METATRON: integration in progressSerenityVault Protocol™ — architecture project•ML-KEM-1024 + ML-DSA-87 (NIST FIPS 203/204)•TRINITY: defense, governance, coordination•AURA and METATRON: integration in progressSerenityVault Protocol™ — architecture project•ML-KEM-1024 + ML-DSA-87 (NIST FIPS 203/204)•TRINITY: defense, governance, coordination•AURA and METATRON: integration in progress
TRINITY™

TRINITY™

Accueil›trinity

Architecture — limits to document

TRINITY organizes defense, governance and coordination functions. This description presents their architectural roles; it does not certify the operational status of hubs or functions.

ALFRED — defense

Described role: observe security signals, assess anomalies and propose defensive measures. Performance and limitations must be documented.

ADÈLE — governance

Described role: assess proposed actions against governance rules and provide for a human veto. TEE/HSM hardware anchoring remains in integration.

ALADIN — coordination

Described role: coordinate authorized responses and study operation under degraded conditions. Distribution across jurisdictions belongs to the roadmap.

ATHENA — automated interface

ATHENA is presented as an automated conversational interface. Its responses may contain errors and are not technical or legal validation.

ASVPRET — architecture framework

ASVPRET connects seven architecture genes to rules, protocols and tests. Authority remains human. Architecture framework. Series 8 is under construction, demonstrated in a staging environment as milestones are reached.

Read the ASVPRET doctrine

Athéna Reception — internal prototype

Internal conversational reception prototype, presented with fictional data. No service available for sale or release schedule is announced.

White paper · ALPHA specification

Series 8 — from classification to audit

The Series 8 white paper describes a traceable processing chain: classify, decide, produce evidence, then prepare it for examination. The steps below present this ALPHA specification.

  1. 1. Classify · TCAC

    A versioned reference classifies cases into ST, SN, CR, CS and INT categories. Each revision receives its own hash.

  2. 2. Decide · ADÈLE

    The engine describes three decisions: ALLOW, DENY or ESCALATE, with structured reasoning and contradiction detection. In ambiguous cases, the specified rule is DENY.

  3. 3. Record · METATRON

    The integrity proof uses SHA3-512 in tests. An append-only log links entries by hashes and aggregates them into a deterministic Merkle root.

  4. 4. Examine · SAK v2

    Reports tailored to auditors, courts or regulators redact sensitive data. An independent Rust verifier is compared with the Python reference.

Interfaces and supervised analysis

SVP-X describes an Evidence/Audit sandbox using OpenAPI 3.1 with separate permissions. Némésis provides for supervised Tier 2 forensic compilation; its dependencies remain simulated in this publication.

Discuss the project